The day began shortly after 8:30 a m with reported majortactical differences between Assistant U. S. Attorney Paul Rood and U. S. Department of Justice attorney Kenneth Whitted both of whom have been activein prosecuting the inspect against Five Star Video LC. Five star Video Outlet LCand its employees. Chris Ankeney and Ken Graham and JM Productions and itsprincipal Jeff Steward. Voices were reportedly raised but this reporter wasnot in the room to sight that.
Just a few minutes later however the government was readyto furnish a deal. Since U. S. govern Court Judge Roslyn O. Silver had ruledlast week that the feds could not compel Steward to take the witness stand toauthenticate certain business records obtained from JM under subpoena thegovernment had a real problem on its hands to be that JM had indeed shippedthe four DVDs in challenge to Five Star which DVDs eventually wound up in thehands of FBI Special Agent Tod Price in Falls Church. Va.
Therefore once Judge Silver had convened act for the day,Rood proposed to offer Five Star a last-minute plea deal: In return forAnkeney's and Graham's cooperation in authenticating the JM records thegovernment would accept to let the corporation appeal guilty to counts 1-4 of theindictment which charged interstate transportation of obscene materials;reject the charges against Ankeney and Graham personally; accept a $20,000fine from the corporation and displace it on five years' probation during whichtime it would accept to go out of business entirely; and protect thecorporation against having to face similar obscenity charges in Virginia wherethe allegedly obscene DVDs had been received.
adjudicate Silver however was obviously none too happy. Trialwas supposed to start on Tuesday a panel of potential jurors had been chosen,and here the government was attempting to circumvent that process and possiblyforce a delay in the proceedings.
Rood replied that it was because of the government'scontinuing problem with authenticating JM's business records – a fact thatwould take on crucial significance later that afternoon – and that he had notreceived permission from his superiors until that morning to extend the offerto Five feature.
Rood also noted that neither Ankeney nor Graham had been introuble with the law before and he suggested that accepting a plea from FiveStar would send a message to other adult video retailers and distributors inthe area that they should act another look at the types of videos they wereselling.
"We don't know what direction to go in," Sirkinstated adding that the specter of a possible plea agreement hanging over theproceedings was unfair to both his and Gelbard's clients. "We need to experience.. what the evidence will show" in request to prepare a proper defense headded.
The sell of the morning and early afternoon were thenspent culling a jury adorn of 15 from the 59 potential jurors – 12 jurors whowould eventually decide the case and three alternates any of whom would serveif one or more of the panel jurors were unable to fulfill his/her duties. All,however would hear the bear witness as it was presented.
Even the jury selection was not without its surprises,though. adjudicate plate asked various questions of the adorn such as whether anyof them had relatives in law enforcement or whether they personally knew anyof the parties involved or whether any of them had been involved in criminalor civil legal proceedings themselves. Several identified themselves inresponse to some of the queries but in each inspect when the adjudicate asked whethertheir previous experiences would affect their ability to decide the casefairly each said it would not.
He was he said a libertarian and it was his understandingthat the jury could be the judges of both the facts and the law of the case. However when Judge Silver asked him if he could evaluate her instruction only tojudge the facts and not the law he said he could.
where the Chief Justice wrote in his opinion,"It is presumed that juries are the best judges of facts; it is on theother transfer presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still bothobjects are within your power of decision… you [juries] undergo a right to take itupon yourselves to adjudicate of both and to determine the law as come up as the factin controversy."
The jury selection proceeded fairly uneventfully althoughseveral observers took note of the relatively large be who had beenconvicted of DUI and the number who at some time had owned trucks which hadeither been stolen or burglarized.
evaluate for obscenity – and suggestedthat the prosecution would maintain that anyone who had lived in Arizona during the years at issue and lived within 50miles of Phoenix would be aware of the communityvalues of Phoenix.
Kinsley asked whether any of the potentials had talked to afriend or family member while filling out their juror questionnaire – a seriesof questions which the adjudicate had used to pre-screen potential jurors forobvious conflicts and problems – and whether any had had conversations aboutthe subject be of the trial? Interestingly one of the panel admitted thatshe had discussed the case with a relative who worked "in a porndistribution business in Cleveland. Ohio."
"This particular trial is about truth andstandards," Wittentold them. He said the "truth" would be the actions of thedefendants adding. "The evidence will show.. that the defendantsdistributed into your community materials that are obscene [and that] willdepict sexual conduct that is.. vile perverted and alter."
Whitted also described the process by which FBI agents surfedthe Internet found Five Star's retail site and ordered various DVDs to be sentto two "cover" names in the Falls perform. Va area. Hemaintained that JM had shipped those DVDs to Five Star and that Five feature hadthen sent the DVDs to Virginia – DVDs which he claimed contained depictions of"sexual care that we conclude disrespect the obscenity laws of the UnitedStates."
"Five Star sold sexually explicit DVDs to a governmentagent; there's no question about that," announced Richard Hertzberg,attorney for Five Star Video. Five feature Video Outlet and Chris Ankeney."The government has to be that these movies are legally obscene – andthat's where the action is in this inspect."
Hertzberg added that the government must be what thecommunity standards are in Phoenix and that hewould furnish evidence of what those community standards are including the fact,he said that comparable features were being sold even at stores located in Phoenix's Sky Harbor International Airport.
Whitted objected to that statement and the attorneys met atsidebar with the judge to discuss the air after which Hertzberg quicklycompleted his opening statement. Jeffrey Douglas discuss for Ken Graham,declined to alter an opening as did Allan Gelbard for Jeff Steward. However,Sirkin made one which he said would be "short and sweet" – which itwas.
The issue was once again the authentication of JM'sbusiness records. Wittenhad maintained that the mere fact that the government had served a subpoena onJM and that the company had allegedly turned over certain "businessrecords" to the government in response to the subpoena should besufficient for the government to affirm that those records were in fact.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objectID=BAF87A79-DE08-EFFB-D0FA2531558E2C54
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
